In
May, we filed an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court in
Acuna v. Turkish. We are excited to report that on Monday,
September 29, the Court will consider whether to take this important
case. We expect the Court to announce its decision the following
week.
This case and our brief are important for two very significant
reasons.
1. Our
brief provides substantial scientifically reliable data
that the Supreme Court said it lacked in the 2007 Partial-Birth Abortion
ruling. In its ruling, the Court acknowledged — for the first time — the
detrimental effects of abortion on women. However, the Court
stated that it had “no reliable data” concerning these effects. This
opened the door for us to provide the Court with substantial scientific evidence
showing the harmful effects of abortion. You can review our brief and the
evidence provided in the extensive research by Dr. Priscilla Coleman (in
Appendix B) on our website at www.trinitylegalcenter.org.
2. The
New Jersey Supreme Court ruling in the Acuna case condones a
physician lying to a pregnant woman! The U.S. Supreme Court’s action on this
case could significantly impact state laws, particularly informed consent
requirements. Specifically, the issue is whether a woman can properly exercise
her constitutional right to decide whether to have an abortion if the
abortionist provides false and misleading information. To obtain informed
consent, a physician must provide accurate and truthful
information..
Our
brief represents Sandra Cano, who was Mary “Doe” in Doe v. Bolton,
the companion case to Roe v. Wade that legalized abortion until the day
of birth; the American Association of Pro-Life OB-Gyns; and, Alveda King
(niece of Dr. Martin Luther King) and other post-abortive women from across the
country.
We ask for your prayers for this case and our brief as the United States
Supreme Court is in conference next Monday, September 29.
About
9,000 cases are appealed to the Supreme Court each year, but the Court only
takes about 90. If the Court takes the case, we are prepared to file another
amicus brief on the merits of the case. Even if the Court decides not to take
this case, our brief provided the evidence it said it lacked in 2007. We will
also be filing amicus briefs in other cases to the Court as opportunities
arise.
We
invite you to visit our recently updated website. You can submit comments at the
bottom of the Home page. If you would like your story featured on the website,
please let us know.
For questions or
comments about this update, contact:
Anne Newman,
Director
Policy and Communications
Leave a comment