An article in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology supposedly putting forth "An ethically justified practical approach to offering recommending,performing, and referring for induced abortion" "
"Because each pregnant patient's perspective on her interests is a
function of her values and beliefs, it would be inappropriate for the
physician to specify for her what her values should be."
Ya have to wonder if NARAL or Planned Parenthood gave then that line. So, why would it be any different if I chose to end the life of my one year old if I think it is against my "values" ?
The justification is that " the fetus lacks the capacity to generate a perspective on its interests". Crazy…
Addressing poor pre natal diagnosis the paper states: "Some viable fetuses will be diagnosed to have severe anomalies. There
is certainty or very high probability of a correct diagnosis and either
certainty or a very high probability of death as an outcome of the
anomaly diagnosed or certainty or a very high probability of severe
irreversible deficit of cognitive developmental capacity as a result of
the anomaly diagnosed.22, 23
When these 2 clinical criteria apply, the beneficence-based obligation
to protect and promote the fetus' health-related interests has reached
its limits. Induced abortion or feticide when these criteria have been
met in rigorous clinical judgment does not violate beneficence-based
obligations to the fetal patient."
Oh really? And who makes them the judge to decide that the life of that child, no matter how short , is not violated?
If you want to read the article I am posting the link:
http://www.ajog.org/article/PIIS0002937809006206/fulltext
There is so much in this piece to address and I cannot right now, buts you can imagine, it is filled with pro abortion distortions and sadly is violating countless people. You have to wonder ho win the heck we got to this point…



Leave a comment