In my post the other day I addressed the outrage by the pro abortion movement regarding the Tebow ad to be aired during the Super Bowl…seems even the New York Times has issues with the "pro choice" groups and makes the same point I did.
"Instead of trying to silence an opponent, advocates for allowing women
to make their own decisions about whether to have a child should be
using the Super Bowl spotlight to convey what their movement is all
about: protecting the right of women like Pam Tebow to make their
private reproductive choices."
The problem of course, is that they are not really advocates for choice, but advocates for abortion. Hopefully, everyone will begin to see that now. here is the editorial:
Super Bowl Censorship
January 30, 2010
The commercials during the Super Bowl, a showcase for the best (or
worst) in TV advertising, often generate buzz and sometimes outrage.
This year, viewers will see one ad that has already triggered a heated
debate about abortion and censorship.
The 30-second spot,
financed by the conservative religious group Focus on the Family, is
said to recount the pregnancy of Pam Tebow, mother of the college
football star Tim Tebow. After falling ill during a mission to the
Philippines, she ignored a recommendation by doctors to abort her fifth
child, who became the 2007 Heisman Trophy winner.
read the rest here: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/31/opinion/31sun4.html



Leave a comment